The Real Case for Auschwitz

Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving Trial Critically Reviewed

The Real Case for Auschwitz

Click on cover image to enlarge.

By Carlo Mattogno

Available Formats:
Suggested price £6.00
Your price
Quantity
Date added: Aug. 19, 2019
Other purchase Options

3rd, revised and corrected edition of 2019. In 1993 Jewish theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a “Holocaust denier.” Irving sued her for libel in return. Subsequently a court case unfolded in England which attracted the attention of the world’s mass media in 2000. The sharpest weapon in Lipstadt’s defense arsenal was Jewish art historian Robert van Pelt, who presented an expert report claiming to refute revisionist assertions about Auschwitz. Because Irving had neither the support by any expert witnesses nor was he himself an expert on the Holocaust, he inevitable lost the case. Robert van Pelt was therefore praised as the defeater of revisionism. When he published his revised expert report in his book The Case for Auschwitz in 2002, he even advanced to the foremost expert on Auschwitz in the public’s eyes.

Mattogno’s The Real Case for Auschwitz is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt. On 590 pages of text, Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes van Pelt’s assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts. The author's first revelation is that van Pelt has committed plagiarism: he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in 1989 and 1993 by French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac – yet without naming his source even once.

Mattogno’s analysis is devastating for both Pressac and van Pelt, as it reveals that their studies of Auschwitz ignore crucial counter-arguments, fail to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means, are highly inconsistent, use deceptive methods, present conflicting sources without due source criticism, deform all sources to serve the author’s perspective, and reveal a shockingly threadbare knowledge of the history of the Auschwitz camps.

Mattogno therefore concludes

The Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources.”

This is a book of prime political and scholarly importance, as it delivers the exterminationists’ case the most devastating blow ever!

3rd, revised and corrected edition.

Suggested price £6.00
Your price
Quantity
Date added: Aug. 19, 2019

Attention!


All proceeds from selling items on this website go 100% to CODOH, if they are paid by credit card. If you want to support CODOH, please consider ordering this way. Other payment options are for the benefit of Castle Hill Publishers.
See here for more details on our payment options
Since we ship on average only once a week, and because book mail can take up to a week or two to arrive, especially if sent abroad, please be patient when awaiting our delivery.


Sorry, there are no alternatives available.


Product Data
Feature Data
Item ID: 11298
Edition no.: 3
Edition type: revised and corrected
Pages: 692
Size: 37.6 MB
Format: ePub
Illustrations: 72 b/w ill.
bibliography, indexed, glossary
Publisher: Uckfield: Castle Hill Publishers
Published in: 8/2019